Forensic Accounting

Forensic accounting is a quickly growing area of accounting concerned with the detection and prevention of monetary fraud and white-collar criminal activities. George A. Manning in his book “Financial Investigation and Forensic Accounting” defines Forensic Accounting because the science of gathering and presenting monetary info in a form that will probably be accepted by a court of jurisprudence against perpetrators of economic crimes. The combination of accounting, auditing, and investigative skills yields the specialty often known as Forensic Accounting which focuses very closely on detecting or preventing accounting fraud. “Forensic”, according to the Webster’s Dictionary means, “Belonging to, utilized in or suitable to courts of judicature or to public dialogue and debate.” The phrase accounting is defined as “a system of recording and summarizing enterprise and financial transactions and analyzing, verifying, and recording the results.” The time period ‘forensic accounting’ refers to financial fraud investigation which incorporates the analysis of accounting information to show or disprove monetary fraud and serving as an skilled witness in Court to show or disprove the same. Thus, basically, the forensic accounting is using accounting for legal purposes.

The Historical past of Forensic Accounting

The forensic accounting can be traced back as far as 1817 to Meyer v. Sefton, a Canadian case that allowed an ‘expert witness’ to testify in court. The time period ‘forensic accounting’ was first published in an article in 1946 “Forensic Accounting- Its Place in In the present day’s Economic system” authored by Maurice E. Peloubet, a companion in Price Waterhouse. He said that, “in the course of the struggle each the public and industrial accountant have been and now engaged within the practice of forensic accounting”. Many scholars have traced the roots of investigative accounting to his work. Interest in forensic accounting unfold by means of the United States and England early in the twentieth century. One of many first establishments to make use of the providers of such investigative accountants was the IRS. The story of Al Capone the famous mobster being caught on a tax evasion scheme is well-known. The FBI decided to make use of forensic accountants and employed nearly 500 such brokers throughout World Struggle II. As a profession, forensic accounting continued to develop during the latter half of the century, as GAAP and tax laws turned widespread and mandatory.

The necessity for Forensic Accounting

Forensic Accounting is a quick rising field in the “World of Accounting”. Although it has been round for a long time, it has become more and more well-liked and far relevant right this moment in view of worldwide financial crisis due to the downfall of the Lehman Brothers and its ripples felt across the globe. Thus, a brand new avatar of Accountant has emerged often called Forensic Accountant. Though Investigative Accounting has been around for years, it has solely just lately begun to rework into a brand new department of accounting, therefore Forensic Accounting. Forensic accountants unlike traditional accountants, look past the numbers, put their nose and eye deep into the monetary books, information and data to uncover fraud, hidden assets, siphoned funds and the like. The word forensic is outlined as the application of scientific knowledge to legal issues and legal proceedings. The phrase accounting is outlined as “a system of recording and summarizing business and financial transactions and analyzing, verifying, and recording the results.” By combining these two definitions it may be concluded that forensic accounting makes use of his regular accounting ideas & practices in authorized situations. Forensic Accounting is like the bridge which connects accounting system to legal system. Thus, we will say that the forensic accounting is an accounting that is utilized in a court of law. One of the notable legal situations in the current previous can be the Enron scandals; where giant numbers of American forensic accountants had been employed. The wave of monetary disaster primarily attributable to corporate malfeasance and fraudulent monetary activities eroded public belief and investor confidence in financial experiences and audit providers and want was felt to look beyond the traditional accounting operate which solely fulfilled the compliance requirements i.e. company’s books of accounts are kept in accordance with guidelines & regulations. In view of the growing number of monetary frauds dedicated by conspiracy with advanced accounting information manipulation, it was felt that a new tribe of Accountant is needed to detect the financial fraud in companies along with his accounting, auditing, and investigative skills and likewise help in legal matters. This area of accounting came to be referred to as ‘forensic accounting’. There is a global consciousness to fight the cases of monetary frauds. Although many methods have been formulated and many actions have been taking to fight in opposition to it, the problem nonetheless persists. One of the main hindrances in preventing financial crime circumstances is lack of high quality forensic evaluation of the monetary statements and data on account of lack of forensic accounting professionals. This author who had been an investigating officer during his tenure with Delhi Police in variety of main cases of economic crimes have faced this dearth of high quality forensic accounting specialists who might have come helpful in well timed & correct investigation of the intricate financial crimes and unearth the advanced modus operandi adopted by the fraudsters who are themselves in some cases extremely qualified financial professionals. The rationale why there was rampant improve in white collar financial crimes because they suppose that they’ll get away with it with impunity and the best deterrent to thwart the criminal act is law enforcement. Nonetheless, the conviction rate within the financial fraud circumstances was very low resulting from weak legislation enforcement which is attributable to weak litigation assist in prosecution process. With out full assist of accounting professional, prosecutors often fail to show and provide sturdy evidence to put fraudsters behind bar. Right here, the Forensic accounting can play an necessary function right here by providing accounting or monetary data or other evidentiary inputs for legal purposes. To realize the aim, forensic accountant moreover having monetary accounting experience, also needs to have proven skill in legislation, scientific investigative approach, interpersonal and communication skills etc.

Development of Forensic Accounting

The Western International locations are utilizing the forensic accounting expertise to address the financial fraud cases. United States and Canada are pioneers in growth & implementation of Forensic Accounting. The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountant not too long ago recognized Investigative and Forensic Accounting as an accounting specialty. The CICA has started granting its members to make use of the designation initials CAIFA who full three years publish qualification expertise as a CA with Diploma in Investigative and Forensic Accounting (DIFA) from the College of Toronto. The CA-designated specialist in investigative and forensic accounting (CAIFA) combines the effectively-recognized and revered attributes of the CA – specifically integrity, understanding of business, and monetary acumen – with an in-depth information and experience in investigative and forensic accounting. The CA-designated specialist in investigative and forensic accounting (CAIFA) combines the properly-recognized and revered attributes of the CA – in particular integrity, understanding of enterprise, and financial acumen – with an in-depth data and expertise in investigative and forensic accounting. This is achieved by means of a career-endorsed certification process that has ongoing expertise and training requirements. The CAIFA tells litigation legal professionals, law enforcement professionals, the courts and other authorized boards that the designated holder is effectively positioned to practise in areas comparable to fraud and economic loss quantification, together with:

· investigating and analyzing financial proof;

· testifying as an knowledgeable witness ;

· changing into concerned in criminal investigations and uncovering financial evidence in worker or insurance coverage fraud circumstances;

· Investigating within the rapidly evolving space of laptop and Internet fraud.

Forensic Accounting implementation in India

Nonetheless in India, this department of accounting has not got its due recognition even after alarming enhance within the complex financial crimes and lack of adequately skilled professionals to analyze and report on the advanced monetary crimes. The duty of Forensic Accountants is dealt with by Chartered Accountants who aside from dealing with traditional observe of auditing as required underneath the Corporations Act, 1956 or Earnings Tax Act are referred to as upon by the regulation enforcement businesses or the companies or non-public individuals to assist in investigating the monetary crime or scam. The CA or CWAs in India are finest fitted to this career due to their monetary acumen acquired throughout their rigorous training which might be additional honed by introducing submit qualification degree or diploma in Investigating and Forensic Accounting just like one launched by CICA. The CA or CWA who acquire post qualification in Investigative & Forensic Accounting can use the designation CA-IFA or CWA-IFA and be legally acknowledged because the Forensic Accounting Specialists to deal with the investigation of monetary crimes and give knowledgeable testimony within the Court docket of Law. Nevertheless, no efforts has up to now been made by the ICAI and ICWAI, the 2 main statutory accounting professional bodies to move in this route and set up a institute which can provide the publish qualification diploma in Investigative and Forensic Accounting to its members.

Nevertheless, rising monetary fraud cases, recent stock marker scams, failure of non financial banking firms, phenomena of vanishing firms and plantation firms and failure of the regulatory mechanism to curb it has compelled the Authorities of India to kind Serious Fraud Investigation Workplace (SFIO) underneath Ministry of Company Affairs which might be regarded the first step of Government of India to recognize the importance and advance the occupation of forensic accountants. The SFIO is a multidisciplinary group having specialists from financial sector, capital market, accountancy, forensic audit, taxation, regulation, information know-how, company legislation, customs and investigation. These specialists have been taken from varied organizations like banks, Securities & Change Board of India, Comptroller and Auditor General and anxious organizations and departments of the Government. Nonetheless, the primary necessary regulation enforcement company involved directly in combating white-collar crimes is the Police, CBI, DRI etc. There’s a total lack on the part of these law enforcement companies to coach their investigators in this specialised part of investigating white-collar crimes involving forensic accounting. The investigation of the key financial crimes is handled by atypical investigating officers who after spending some time in investigation of typical crimes are shunted to the financial offence wing and they’re anticipated to handle the monetary crime circumstances involving complicated & intricate monetary information which is required to be analyzed to unearth crime or unique MO adopted by the white collar criminal. The result is obvious, the case dies its pure dying and the criminals roam free as the IO given his lack of specialised data & qualification fails to correctly investigate the monetary crime to its logical conclusion. However if we take a look at the western international locations significantly USA, the law enforcement businesses of which like DEA, FBI, CIA has nicely marshaled its pool of particular agents having forensic accounting backgrounds that are the backbone of the bureau’s financial crimes and terrorism financing items and investigate with professional acumen, the complicated financial crime like cash laundering, web crimes, financial establishment fraud and different financial crimes. Today, there are greater than 600 FBI agents with accounting backgrounds. Thus, it’s extremely crucial on the part of regulation enforcement agencies in India that they follow the swimsuit and engage specialist forensic accountant on its roll whose engagements referring to criminal issues typically arise in the aftermath of economic fraud.

The Indian Regulation which refers to Forensic Accounting:

1) The Corporations Act, 1956:

a) Section 235 and 237: There are provisions in Corporations Act (Part 235 and 237) which empowers the Central Government to examine the books of accounts of an organization, to direct particular audit, to order investigation into the affairs of an organization and to launch prosecution for violation of the Corporations Act, 1956. Books of accounts and other paperwork of the businesses are inspected by the officers of the Directorate of Inspection and Investigation and the Registrars of Companies. These inspections are designed to search out out whether the businesses conduct their affairs in accordance with the provisions of the Corporations Act, 1956 to see whether or not any unfair practices prejudicial to the general public curiosity are being resorted to by any firm or a group of companies and to examine whether or not there is any mismanagement which can adversely have an effect on any curiosity of the shareholders, collectors, workers and others. Wherever inspection reports disclose any information that may be of curiosity to different Departments or companies like the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Enforcement Directorate, State Government or Provident Fund Authorities, such data is handed on to them. If an inspection discloses a prima facie case of fraud or cheating, action is initiated underneath provisions of the Firms Act, 1956 or the same is referred to the Central Bureau of Investigation.

b) Provisions of Sick Industrial Firms Act integrated into the Companies Act, 1956: The Part 424A(5) of the Firms Act, 1956 empowers Nationwide Firm Regulation Tribunal (NCLT) to examine as preliminary challenge whether or not the company is a sick industrial company us 2(46AA). Thus even earlier than analyzing the viability of the scheme of revival proposed by the company, NCLT can test the genuineness of the reference made to it. Thus, inquiry by operating agency will solely be to allow NCLT to resolve the viability of the scheme and to evaluate whether the corporate has the ability to revive on its own. Further, Section 424B of the Companies Act, 1956 empowers the tribunal to make such inquiry as it might deem match for determining whether any industrial company has become a sick industrial company. Additional, the Tribunal may, if it deems essential or expedient so to do for the expeditious disposal of an inquiry, require by order any operating company to investigate into the scheme for revival and make a report with respect to such matter as may be specified in the order. Working agency is group of consultants consisting of individuals having particular information in banking & business during which sick industrial firm is engaged and contains public financial institution, State stage establishment, scheduled financial institution or some other some other particular person as may be specified by general or particular order as its agency by the Board. Thus, Forensic Accountant could be a part of working company and investigate whether or not the reference made by the company is real or the accounts are manipulated or fabricated to go well with the scheme of reference made to NCLT to declare it as sick company and thereby siphon public funds.

2) SEBI Act, 1992:

The share market is extremely unstable and the brokers indulge into varied unfair and fraudulent trade practices like synchronized share trading, manipulate and fabricate the books of accounts and cheat the gullible investors. Regulation eleven C of the SEBI Act, 1992 empowers the SEBI to direct any individual to research the affairs of intermediaries or brokers related to the securities market whose transactions in securities are being dealt with in a manner detrimental to the investors or the securities market. Thus fraudulent and unfair commerce practices of the brokers or market intermediaries are investigated by the investigator appointed by SEBI which require the broker or market middleman to furnish info, books of accounts, registers, documents or data etc. which is analyzed by the investigator to seek out out any manipulation, fraudulent apply or in any other case of the broker. Thus, Forensic Accountant can play a lead function in assisting the SEBI to unearth the complex share associated frauds perpetrated by the brokers.

3) The Insurance Act, 1938:

Part 33 of the mentioned Act empowers the IRDA to direct any individual (“Investigating Authority”) to research the affairs of any insurer. The investigating authority may search help of the auditor (or actuary or both) who shall be the Chartered Accountant within the that means of Chartered Accountant Act, 1949 for the purpose of aiding him in any investigation. The books of account, registers and other paperwork are taken by the investigating authority in its custody to analyze it to seek out out the manipulations or fabrication in the books of accounts. Thus, Chartered Accountants plays a entrance role as an Forensic Accountant and support in the investigation performed into the affairs of the insurer as per the provisions of Insurance Act, 1938.

four)  The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002:

Section three of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 defines the offence of money laundering as involvement of a person in any process or activity linked with the proceeds of crime and projecting it as untainted property. The three necessary phases within the money laundering process are:

· Placement: Physical disposal of cash acquired from illegal sources by depositing the cash in home banks or other kinds of financial institutions.

· Layering: Working through complicated layers of monetary transactions to distance the illicit proceeds from their source and disguise the audit trail.

· Integration: Making the wealth derived from crime seems legitimate.

Forensic Accountant can often be concerned within the following antimony laundering activities:

· Investigating and analyzing financial evidence to determine a suspicious transaction;

· Developing computerized applications to assist in the evaluation and presentation of financial proof;

· Communicating their findings within the form of stories, reveals and collections of paperwork that assist the banks in submission of the suspicious transaction stories to the regulator; and

· Helping in authorized proceedings, together with testifying in courtroom as an professional witness and preparing visual aids to assist trial evidence.

5)  The Firms (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2003:

CARO, 2003 requires the auditor to report back to the effect that if a considerable a part of fixed assets have been disposed off throughout the yr, whether or not it has affected the going concern status. To be able to carry out the duties, the auditor has to draw a corollary and reference to the section 293 Firms Act, 1956, AS 24 (‘Discontinuing Operations’) and to AAS 16 (Going Concern) and thereafter make his observations on this matter. It also requires the auditor to report on Frauds i.e.; if any fraud on or by the corporate has been seen or reported through the year.

Expert forensic accounting evidence

Who is an knowledgeable witness?

An expert witness is a witness, who by virtue of schooling, training, skill, or expertise, is believed to have data in a specific subject beyond that of the average person, sufficient that others could officially (and legally) rely on the witness’s specialized (scientific, technical or other) opinion about an evidence or reality problem within the scope of their expertise, known as the professional opinion, as an help to the actual fact-finder. Skilled proof is proof given to a court or tribunal by a person, skilled and experienced in some professional or technical sphere, of the conclusions he has reached on the idea of his knowledge, from details reported to him or discovered by him by exams, measurements or related means. It is commonly given by, for instance, docs, chemists, surveyors, architects, accountants and the like. In a Scottish case, Davie v Edinburgh Magistrates (1953) , it was said that the function of an knowledgeable witness “…is to furnish the judge with the necessary scientific standards for testing the accuracy of his conclusions, in order to allow the judge to kind his personal independent judgment by the applying of these standards to the details proved in proof” .

An expert witness is completely different from atypical witness

Expert witnesses have a special standing from peculiar witnesses when giving proof at a Court or different judicial or quasi-judicial tribunals. The proof of the “knowledgeable” differs from that of the peculiar witness who testifies as to details observed, in that the expert is permitted to express his/her opinion on a matter that has occurred up to now, or might happen sooner or later which have not been actually observed by the expert, who’s providing evidence. The relevance and weight which the Courtroom or tribunal will attribute to such an opinion throughout the whole proof which is adduced is a matter for the Court docket or tribunal.

An skilled, in contrast to other witnesses, is allowed, because of his particular qualifications and/or expertise, to give opinion evidence. It’s for his opinion evidence that he’s referred to as, not for his view of the information or circumstances of the dispute, although his interpretation of the information is commonly needed so as to clarify and/or justify his conclusions.

Forensic Accountant as an Knowledgeable Witness:

The tradition and regulation referring to the standing of the specialists as witnesses dates back to English Courts round 1550. However, the first recorded use of an accountant as an knowledgeable witness was in Meyer V. Sefton, 2 Stark. 274 (1817). The use of Forensic Accountant testifying as an professional witness in the Courtroom of law is becoming more and more prevalent today in view of the rapid increase in the monetary fraud cases. In court circumstances the place the data of an skilled may help to better explain the info in problem or related details, an “expert witness” may be referred to as upon to give knowledgeable testimony.

Section forty five of the Evidence Act which makes opinion of specialists admissible, lays down that when the Court has to form an opinion upon a degree of international regulation, or of science, or art, or as to id of handwriting or finger impressions, the opinions upon that point of persons specially skilled in such foreign regulation, science or artwork, or in questions as to identification of handwriting, or finger impressions are related facts. Nevertheless, neither the Indian Evidence Act nor there’s any seminal judicial pronouncements which clarifies as to when, how and beneath what circumstances, the testimony of Forensic Accounting Professional would be admissible or inadmissible.

So as, to carry the proof of a witness as that of an expert it must be proven that he has made a particular research of the topic or acquired a special experience therein or in different words that he is expert and has ample data of the subject. The Cost Accountant or Chartered Accountant might be considered as an expert to offer testimony inside the which means of Section 45 of the Evidence Act. Furthermore, the draft of “The Firms Invoice, 2008″ contains the definition u/s 2 (1) (zn) which interalia contains Value Accountant and Chartered Accountant within the definition of “Knowledgeable” which might be additionally considered/extended for relying upon their testimony within the Criminal/civil instances by the court.

In USA, nevertheless, the admissibility of the Forensic Accounting Knowledgeable testimony is supported by the Judicial Pronouncements and Federal Rule of Evidence. Over the years, the US Supreme Courtroom has delivered several decisions clarifying its requirements for the admission of expert testimony:

In Frye v. U.S., the Court acknowledged that expert testimony will likely be admitted if based on a strategy “usually accepted” by the scientific community.

In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) the Courtroom concluded that the trial choose must act as a gatekeeper for professional testimony, considering a number of nonexclusive elements relevant

to the testimony’s reliability and relevance, including:

· Whether the idea or technique has been or may be tested,

· Whether the theory or method has been subjected to look assessment or publication,

· The identified or potential charge of error, and

· Whether or not the speculation or approach is usually accepted in the relevant scientific community.

Though Daubert targeted on the admissibility of scientific knowledgeable testimony, its progeny have had an amazing influence on Monetary Professional testimony. In Kumho Tire Co. V. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), the Court made clear that the gatekeeper function applies to all knowledgeable testimony, not just scientifically-primarily based testimony.

Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence effectively codifies the Supreme Court’s selections in “Daubert” and “Kumho”. Rule 702 provides that if the Courtroom finds that scientific, technical or different specialized information “will help the trier of fact to grasp the proof or to determine a truth in subject,” and if the Court finds that the witness is qualified as an expert “by data, talent, expertise, coaching, or training,” then the Courtroom might allow the witness to testify — as long as the witness’ testimony is predicated on “enough facts or information,” the testimony “is the product of dependable principles and methods,” and the witness has “applied the principles and methodology reliably to the info of the case.

Further, regarding determinations of nonscientific professional testimony reliability, monetary knowledgeable testimony (which includes Forensic Accountant Testimony) in particular, the Advisory Committee on the Federal Guidelines of Evidence and the Standing Committee on Guidelines of Observe and Procedure (“Committee”) which proposed amendments to the texts of Guidelines 701, 702, and 703, specifically observed:

“Some sorts of skilled testimony will not depend on anything like a scientific technique, and so must be evaluated by reference to different customary rules attendant to the actual space of expertise. . . . The knowledgeable’s testimony have to be grounded in an accepted physique of learning or experience within the skilled’s field, and the skilled must clarify how the conclusion is so grounded. “Whether or not the testimony considerations financial rules, accounting requirements, property valuation or different non-scientific topics, it needs to be evaluated by reference to the ‘data and expertise’ of that individual field.”

Due to this fact, below the Federal Guidelines of Proof, a decide will allow an accountant to testify as an professional witness only if the choose decides that:

The accountant’s testimony will assist the jurors or judge understand the evidence or decide a reality in issue.

The accountant is qualified as an professional by data, ability, expertise, training, or education.

The accountant can present that his or her testimony (a) will likely be based on adequate facts or data and (b) would be the product of dependable rules and methods which have been applied reliably to the facts of the case. (These requirements are sometimes referred to in shorthand as “qualification, reliability, and fit.”)

Thus, under the rule announced in Daubert v. Merrill-Dow Prescribed drugs, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and expanded in Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), the courts must be certain that experts-scientific and otherwise-will supply testimony that is methodologically sound and related to the facts of the case before admitting their professional testimony.

Qualifying as an Expert Witness

Challenges to financial skilled testimony have skyrocketed in latest years. Since Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993), an rising number of testifying consultants have been subjected to challenges by opposing counsel in an try to forestall the specialists from testifying (Journal of Forensic Accounting: 1524-5586/Vol.IV(2003), Web page-113). Figlewicz and Sprohge in their article, “The CPA’s Knowledgeable Witness Function in Litigation Companies: A Maze of Legal and Accounting Requirements,” supply ten pointers to help keep away from legal challenges:

1. Know the related professional standards.

2. Apply the relevant skilled standards.

3. Know the relevant skilled literature.

4. Know the relevant professional organizations.

5. Use typically accepted analytical methods.

6. Use a number of analytical methods.

7. Synthesize the conclusions of the multiple analytical methods.

8. Disclose all important analytical assumptions and variables.

9. Subject the analysis to look review.

10. Check the analysis-and the conclusions-for reasonableness.

Now the varied investigation businesses corresponding to Police, CBI etc. are taking the help of CA/CWA as a Forensic Accountant and utilizing their report as evidence within the cases of felony/civil nature. Whether or not the aforesaid rules/tips laid down by the 2 US Supreme Court Judgments incorporated into Federal Guidelines of Proof can be adopted by Indian Courts or not will grow to be clear within the due course of time.

Nevertheless, the fact is that though till immediately there’s normal acceptance of admissibility of scientific evidence and knowledgeable’s opinion in Indian Courts, there is no such thing as a particular law with respect to this which lays down standards, ideas or guidelines in clear phrases with regard to when the skilled opinion could be admissible and when it won’t as is the case beneath the US federal law. Section forty five of the Indian Proof Act is inadequate on this regard. However, in case of doubt, the rules laid down by US Supreme Courtroom could be adhered to. In conclusion, one ought to perceive that it is finally for the Courtroom Of Legislation to decide as to who is certified as an knowledgeable by information, talent, expertise, coaching or schooling, who could testify thereto within the form of an opinion or in any other case if:

1. The testimony relies upon adequate information or information,

2. The take a look at is the product of reliable rules and strategies, and

3. The witness has utilized the ideas and strategies reliably to the details of the case

However, little doubt, with the speedy increase in the instances involving misappropriation of funds, manipulation of books of accounts, banking fraud circumstances, Securities scams etc. involving complex monetary transactions, the Forensic Accountants and admissibility of their testimony must be elucidated and these can be figuring out factors for deciding the destiny of these cases. The involvement of Forensic Accountant in financial fraud instances and his testimony won’t only take these instances to logical conclusion but in addition will go a great distance ahead to place a curb on these menace of white collar offences.

 

This post is written by Edward White 12, he is a web enthusiast and ingenious blogger who loves to write about many different topics, such aschina visa. His educational background in journalism and family science has given him a broad base from which to approach many topics, including chinese visa and many others. He enjoys experimenting with various techniques and topics like visa to china, and has a love for creativity. He has a really strong passion for scouring the internet in search of inspirational topics.